See what a RevTopo diagnostic actually looks like

This is a real deliverable from a real engagement — anonymized, but unedited. Enter your work email to view the sample.

Company email required. No spam — we'll send one follow-up, that's it.

RevTopo
Home Case Studies Pricing Start a Conversation
Sample Diagnostic

Cross-Deal Analysis:
What we actually deliver

This is an anonymized excerpt from a real RevTopo diagnostic for a B2B SaaS company selling into a regulated vertical. 12 deals. 31 calls. 47 hours of conversation. Three findings that changed how they sell.

12Deals Analyzed
31Calls Scored
47hrsConversation
2.8ptMEDDPICC Gap

Anonymized sample. All company names, individual names, and deal values have been redacted. The analysis methodology, scoring framework, and insight structure are exactly as delivered to the client.

Executive Summary

Three critical discoveries from 12 deals

Through in-depth analysis of 12 deals (6 Won, 6 Lost), 31 sales calls, and 47 hours of customer conversations, we identified three patterns driving outcomes at this company.

Finding 01
83%

The Champion Crisis

83% of won deals had active champions. 83% of lost deals didn't. The single strongest predictor of outcomes at this company.

Finding 02
2/12

Unquantified Value

Only 2 of 12 deals fully quantified ROI. Reps identified pain effectively but couldn't translate it into dollars for the economic buyer.

Finding 03
189hrs

Wasted Capacity

3 of 12 deals should have been disqualified earlier, consuming 189 hours — equivalent to 1.2 reps' quarterly capacity.

Qualification Scoring

Won vs. Lost — MEDDPICC element by element

Every deal was scored 0–2 on each MEDDPICC element across every call. This table shows the averages and where the gaps predict outcomes.

MEDDPICC ElementWon AvgLost AvgGapWhat This Means
Champion1.831.00+0.83Biggest predictor of success
Decision Criteria1.831.00+0.83Reps not influencing requirements
Identified Pain1.831.40+0.43Pain found but not quantified
Economic Buyer1.170.80+0.37Often never identified or engaged
Paper Process1.171.00+0.17Surprises at contract stage
Metrics1.331.20+0.13Weakest area for both outcomes
Decision Process1.501.40+0.10Generally understood
Competition1.501.40+0.10Incumbent not differentiated
Total Score12.09.2+2.830% qualification gap

*One anomaly deal (a perfectly qualified opportunity lost to an unforeseen catastrophic budget cut) was excluded from Lost averages.

Deep Dive: The Champion Gap

What active champions actually do vs. passive contacts

The presence of a true champion was the single most critical factor. Here's what we heard in the calls — real quotes, anonymized.

What Champions Do (Won Deals)

"Congratulations, you've got my endorsement."— External consultant, Deal #4 (Won)
"I want to make the most compelling pitch that I can because I do think we would be more effective with it."— Director of Admissions, Deal #3 (Won)
"I would like for you and I to have a meeting before... to make sure you're on the same page with language and everything."— VP Student Services, Deal #6 (Won)

What Passive Contacts Look Like (Lost)

"I'm a fan of the platform... but for a different institution."— Director of Innovation, Deal #11 (Lost)
Contact facilitated initial access but couldn't maintain momentum when the economic buyer became unavailable.— VP Student Services, Deal #7 (Lost)
Liked the solution but failed to navigate IT blockers or secure the crucial economic buyer meeting.— Director of Admissions, Deal #9 (Lost)
The champion litmus test we built for this client: Does the contact articulate your value proposition in their own words? Have they given you insider coaching on politics/process? Will they personally lose if this deal doesn't happen? Have they proven they can get things done internally?
Deal-Level Analysis

Every deal gets this level of scrutiny

The full diagnostic includes MEDDPICC progression tracking, call-by-call scoring, gap analysis, and specific next-step recommendations for every deal. Here are two anonymized examples.

Deal #3 — [Redacted University]Won
13/16MEDDPICC Score
3Calls Analyzed
2Champions
2/2Competition
Key finding: Dual champions were actively driving the deal. One explicitly requested "ammunition" to make a compelling internal pitch during a period of budget pressure. The sales team's CSO joined the final call and had the authority to make pricing concessions, which gave the champion the confidence to move forward. Risk: The economic buyer was never directly engaged — the entire business case was presented by the champion without input from the financial decision-maker.
Deal #11 — [Redacted University]Lost
7/16MEDDPICC Score
2Calls Analyzed
0/2Champion
0/2Economic Buyer
Key finding: Fatal product misalignment. The prospect wanted a point solution (chatbot) to integrate with their existing multi-million dollar CRM investment. The team pitched a broad platform replacement — which the prospect described as "way more than what we need and probably want to manage." Should have been disqualified after the first call when the core differentiator was rejected.
Deal #1 — [Redacted University]Won
12/16Score
Compelling event drove urgency throughout the cycle. The champion was the technical lead and task force chair. Paper process was meticulously mapped with all signatories identified.
Deal #7 — [Redacted College]Lost
8/16Score
Discovery was treated as an event rather than a process. Value was never quantified. Price increase introduced at the worst possible moment.

10 more deals in the full diagnostic

Every deal gets MEDDPICC progression tracking, call-by-call scoring, red flag identification, and specific next-step actions.

Start a Conversation →
What Comes Next

From diagnosis to transformation roadmap

The full diagnostic doesn't just identify problems — it provides a prioritized, phased roadmap with revenue impact modeling for each fix.

Phase 1

Pipeline Quality Gates

Stage-gate minimum scores, go/no-go decision criteria, and disqualification frameworks built from this client's specific data.

Phase 2

Champion Development

Champion identification scorecard, testing questions, enablement toolkit, and role-play certification — all based on what winners at this company actually did.

Phase 3

Value Quantification

Industry-specific ROI calculators, discovery question banks, cost-of-inaction modeling — tied to the specific gaps found in this team's conversations.

© 2026 RevTopo. Win/Loss Analysis & Sales Diagnostics.